2010 user friendly handbook for project evaluation pdf

New jica guidelines for project evaluation first edition. The handbook discusses quantitative and qualitative evaluation methods. Science, mathematics, engineering and technology education. The 2010 userfriendly handbook of project evaluation. National science foundation includes information on evaluation prototypes, developing questions, data collection techniques, analyzing data, and much more. The original handbook provided a framework for evaluation as a useful program tool. Division of research, evaluation, and communication. The 2010 userfriendly handbook for project evaluation pdf this how to guide by joy frechtling, melvin m. The 2002 user friendly handbook for project evaluation updated 124 frechtling, j.

Writing the broader impacts section of your research proposal the standalone broader impacts bi section, which is a major cause of angst for many applicants, isnt really that hard to write provided that you understand what the national science foundation. Science, mathematics, engineering and technology education, issued in 1993, describes the types of evaluations principal investigatorsproject directors pispds may be called upon to perform over the lifetime of a project. Download office 2010 user resources pdf from official microsoft download center. National science foundation, directorate for education and human. The 2010 user friendly handbook of project evaluation. Online evaluation resource library for nsfs directorate for education and human resources. Assessing public opinion directly to keep current with changing community needs. National science foundation 2010 user friendly handbook for project evaluation this handbook is aimed at people who need to learn more about both what evaluation can do and how to do an evaluation, including overviews of evaluation types, steps in doing an evaluation, quantitative and qualitative data collection, and culturally responsive. The 2010 userfriendly handbook for project evaluation developed by joy frechtling, westat. As an evaluation tool, the survey allows programs to document student representation, monitor student ratings of their learning, describe student research activities, and gauge the likelihood that the ur experience has changed or confirmed students plans to pursue stem education and careers.

The logic model for program planning and evaluation. Nsf program officers viewscs ed project evaluation acm. Project evaluation is a systematic and objective assessment of an ongoing or. Nsf 02057, the 2002 userfriendly handbook for project evaluation. The 2002 userfriendly handbook for project evaluation this guide is aimed at education program managers seeking information to help manage evaluation projects and communicate with evaluators. Synthesis of articles in evaluation and program planning. This report included a chapter providing an overview of quantitative and qualitative data collection methods, thus suggesting to us the importance of clarifying. The 2010 userfriendly handbook for project evaluation posted on september 24, 2010 by nsf in getting started nsf user friendly handbook for evaluation. The community food project evaluation toolkit toolkit is a handson workbook designed to help community food project cfp staff conduct evaluations of their programs to develop the kind of information that will be compelling not only to fellow staff but. Wisconsin department of health services dhs evaluation. This guidebook is designed to provide advice to vice presidents, provosts, deans, faculty, and administrators about the evaluation of science, technology, engineering and mathematics stem diversity programs at the graduate school level.

To develop this handbook, we have drawn on the similar handbooks and tools developed for the national science foundation especially the 1993 userfriendly handbook for project evaluation and the 1997 userfriendly handbook for. The new guide is available here by clicking download pdf. Research questionobjective tasks what will be countedmeasured sketch one graph that might appear in a paper about this project. Userfriendly handbook for project evaluations frechtling, 2002. Supported by the national science foundation, the oerl includes sample evaluation plans, instruments, and reports for a number of evaluation areas including curriculum development. Office of educational innovation and evaluation oeie. The first publication, userfriendly handbook for project evaluation. Program evaluation resources evaluation guides, handbooks, and websites community toolbox. Innovation through institutional integration i3 challenges faculty, students, and others in institutions of higher education, including two and fouryear colleges, to think strategically about the creative integration of nsffunded awards, with particular emphasis on awards managed by programs in the directorate for education and human resources ehr.

It gives a comprehensive guide to project evaluation and is generally meant for much larger projects than those in a career education component. The 2002 userfriendly handbook for project evaluation national. The framework must be simple and userfriendly enough for all s t a f fproject, programme and country office and headquartersto use it in flexible ways that ultimately enhance the development effectiveness of the organization as a whole. Section iv strategies that address culturally responsive evaluations 50kb. The 2010 userfriendly handbook of project evaluation joy a. Chapter 1presents a basic introduction to the logic model as an actionoriented tool for program planning and evaluation. The 2010 userfriendly handbook for project evaluation pdf. Download office 2010 user resources pdf from official. Science, mathematics, engineering and technology education stevens, floraline i on. The 2010 userfriendly handbook for project evaluation prepared under contract rec 9912175 by joy frechtling westat with contributing authors of three special sections. Improving health and safety conditions in agriculture. The study design was a mixed methods approach to data analysis.

Writing the broader impacts section of your research proposal. The 2010 user friendly handbook for project evaluation pages 114 group 1 presentation chapter 1 reasons for conducting evaluations chapter 2 evaluation prototypes lyndsay goeckeritz lee mcfatridge danita sanders when a project consists of multiple components, evaluations might. This report included a chapter providing an overview of quantitative and qualitative data collection methods, thus suggesting to us the importance of clarifying the nature of mixed methods research. Developed for the division of research and learning in formal and informal settings, national science foundation.

Introduction the logic model development guidecontains four chapters and two comprehensive appendices. Pdf the 2002 user friendly handbook for project evaluation published version. You may need a pdf reader to view some of the files on this page. The 2002 user friendly handbook for project evaluation. National science foundation 2010 userfriendly handbook for project evaluation this handbook is aimed at people who need to learn more about both what evaluation can do and how to do an evaluation, including overviews of evaluation types, steps in doing an evaluation, quantitative and qualitative data collection, and culturally responsive.

Quality projects funded by the foundation must be of an extremely high scientific, technical and. Selecting a language below will dynamically change the complete page content to that language. Reproductions supplied by edrs are the best that can be. View the evaluation guide, measuring diversity pdf. It is aimed at people who need to learn more about both the value of evaluation and how to design and carry out an evaluation, rather than those who already have a solid base of experience in. Croatian science foundation project evaluation manual 4 basic principles of evaluation the evaluation of project proposals is based on the following principles. The handbook includes chapters on the reasons for conducting. Includes sample forms for recording information obtained using these techniques, approaches to data analysis, reporting and drawing conclusions. This handbook was developed to provide project directors and principal investigators working with the national science foundation. It is aimed at people who need to learn more about both what evaluation can do and how to do an evaluation, rather than those who already have a solid base of experience in the. Project evaluation, framework for evaluating impacts of informal science. Posted on september 24, 2010 by nsf in getting started. The 2010 user friendly handbook for project evaluation prepared under contract rec 9912175 by joy frechtling westat with contributing authors of three special sections.

Conducting project evaluation is waived for charitable and nonprofit. Best practices for mixed methods research in the health. To develop this handbook, we have drawn on the similar handbooks and tools developed for the national science foundation especially the 1993 userfriendly handbook for project evaluation and the 1997 userfriendly handbook for mixedmethod evaluations. This handbook was developed to provide managers working with the national science foundation nsf with a basic guide for the evaluation of nsfs educational programs. The undergraduate research student selfassessment urssa. The 2010 userfriendly handbook for project evaluations. This revised and updated unodc evaluation handbook has been designed as a userfriendly resource to inspire and guide unodc stakeholders to promote evaluation and. The 2002 userfriendly handbook for project evaluation. The current handbook, userfriendly guide to mixed method evaluations, builds on the first but. Chapter 2consists of exercises and examples focused on the development of a simple program logic. The 2002 userfriendly handbook for project evaluation pdf 92 pp. It is aimed at people who need to learn more about what evaluation can do and how to do an evaluation. National science foundation, directorate for education and human resources, division of research, evaluation, and.

Pdf the 2002 userfriendly handbook for project evaluation. It describes how the evaluation of project achievements improves. However, special attention has been given to aligning the handbook to nsfs unique needs and. The 2010 userfriendly handbook for project evaluation pages 114 group 1 presentation chapter 1 reasons for conducting evaluations chapter 2 evaluation prototypes lyndsay goeckeritz lee mcfatridge danita sanders when a project consists of multiple components, evaluations might. Publications center for culturally responsive evaluation. Based evaluation evaluation theories and models 14. The 2010 user friendly handbook for project evaluation. The 2010 userfriendly handbook for project evaluation. National science foundation, directorate for education and human resources, division of research, evaluation, and communication. This handbook was developed to provide project directors and principal investigators working with the national science foundation nsf with a basic guide for evaluating nsfs educational projects. Rog, veronica thomas, henry frierson, stafford hood, gerunda hughes and elmima johnson, is a comprehensive guide. It is aimed at people who need to learn more about both the value of evaluation and how to design and carry out an evaluation, rather than those who already have a solid base of experience in the. National science foundation directorate for education and human resources 2010 a guide for non profit organizations on proposal writing.